<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Code Sharing Project Created</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/</link>
	<description>The Cheeze to Your Macaroni - Games, Open Source Programming, and Other Odd Ramblings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colby Cheeze</title>
		<link>http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cheeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheezeworld.com/?p=40#comment-54</guid>
		<description>You are right. I didn&#039;t even think about that. Guess I should have read a little bit more before putting all the license info on the code. I&#039;ll go ahead and change it up. Thanks Scarybug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. I didn&#8217;t even think about that. Guess I should have read a little bit more before putting all the license info on the code. I&#8217;ll go ahead and change it up. Thanks Scarybug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarybug</title>
		<link>http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheezeworld.com/?p=40#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Since most people would want to be able to monetize games that used these libraries, and since sponsors are more likely to sponsor games that are not open-source, wouldn&#039;t it be better to release these under the LGPL instead of the GPL? That way we&#039;d only have to release changes to the actual library instead of making all of our game code public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since most people would want to be able to monetize games that used these libraries, and since sponsors are more likely to sponsor games that are not open-source, wouldn&#8217;t it be better to release these under the LGPL instead of the GPL? That way we&#8217;d only have to release changes to the actual library instead of making all of our game code public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

