<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Code Sharing Project Created</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/</link>
	<description>The Cheeze to Your Macaroni - Games, Open Source Programming, and Other Odd Ramblings.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colby Cheeze</title>
		<link>http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cheeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheezeworld.com/?p=40#comment-54</guid>
		<description>You are right. I didn't even think about that. Guess I should have read a little bit more before putting all the license info on the code. I'll go ahead and change it up. Thanks Scarybug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. I didn&#8217;t even think about that. Guess I should have read a little bit more before putting all the license info on the code. I&#8217;ll go ahead and change it up. Thanks Scarybug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarybug</title>
		<link>http://cheezeworld.com/google-code-sharing-project-created/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheezeworld.com/?p=40#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Since most people would want to be able to monetize games that used these libraries, and since sponsors are more likely to sponsor games that are not open-source, wouldn't it be better to release these under the LGPL instead of the GPL? That way we'd only have to release changes to the actual library instead of making all of our game code public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since most people would want to be able to monetize games that used these libraries, and since sponsors are more likely to sponsor games that are not open-source, wouldn&#8217;t it be better to release these under the LGPL instead of the GPL? That way we&#8217;d only have to release changes to the actual library instead of making all of our game code public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
